https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Index ${session.getAttribute("locale")} 5 https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:30431 Wed 11 Apr 2018 14:34:36 AEST ]]> https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:27292 Wed 02 Oct 2019 10:20:41 AEST ]]> https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:14616 2, females 41.3 years, 24.0 kg/m². Reproducibility was assessed over six months using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests and comparative validity was assessed by intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) estimated by fitting a mixed effects model for each nutrient to account for age, sex and BMI to allow estimation of between and within person variance. Results: Reproducibility was found to be good for both WFR and FFQ since there were no significant differences between round 1 and 2 administrations. For comparative validity, FFQ ICCs were at least as large as those for WFR. The ICC of the WFR-FFQ difference for total energy intake was 0.6 (95% CI 0.43, 0.77) and the median ICC for all nutrients was 0.47, with all ICCs between 0.15 (%E from saturated fat) and 0.7 (g/day sugars). Conclusions: Compared to WFR the AES FFQ is suitable for reliably estimating the dietary intakes of Australian adults across a wide range of nutrients.]]> Sat 24 Mar 2018 08:20:46 AEDT ]]> https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:17872 Sat 24 Mar 2018 07:56:12 AEDT ]]>